<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stumbleupon vs Digg &#8211; Voyeurs vs Sheep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/</link>
	<description>The Non SEO Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3300</guid>
		<description>From my experience as a StumbleUpon user for a few years now, StumbleUpon users tend to be more likely to leave a comment when it is negative than when it is positive. Positive comments are usually only left when they want the page to appear on their blog. Also, in some categories, there people who apparently subscribe to the category simply to leave negative comments on about everything. This is the case in Christianity for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience as a StumbleUpon user for a few years now, StumbleUpon users tend to be more likely to leave a comment when it is negative than when it is positive. Positive comments are usually only left when they want the page to appear on their blog. Also, in some categories, there people who apparently subscribe to the category simply to leave negative comments on about everything. This is the case in Christianity for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plurkshop 16: StumbleUpon &#124; SU Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>Plurkshop 16: StumbleUpon &#124; SU Comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>[...] asked &#8220;What are the basic differences between SU and Digg?&#8221; Ethnicomm suggested a great article by Tim Nash that I hadn&#8217;t read before, but explains the differences well. (Thanks, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asked &#8220;What are the basic differences between SU and Digg?&#8221; Ethnicomm suggested a great article by Tim Nash that I hadn&#8217;t read before, but explains the differences well. (Thanks, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trademark registration</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>trademark registration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>Stumble upon is great. Digg used to be great. Really accurate comparison here. I would have dugg down digg a little more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumble upon is great. Digg used to be great. Really accurate comparison here. I would have dugg down digg a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview: Tim Nash On Social Media, Digg, StumbleUpon &#38; His New Membership Site &#124; Search Engine Marketing, Social Media &#38; Web Solutions &#124; Squareoak - New York, NY &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Interview: Tim Nash On Social Media, Digg, StumbleUpon &#38; His New Membership Site &#124; Search Engine Marketing, Social Media &#38; Web Solutions &#124; Squareoak - New York, NY &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>[...] the year looking at Digg and StumbleUpon and comparing the two and while 8 months is a lot of time, both of those posts are still relevant though perhaps some of the factors have changed a little. Certainly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the year looking at Digg and StumbleUpon and comparing the two and while 8 months is a lot of time, both of those posts are still relevant though perhaps some of the factors have changed a little. Certainly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; How Good Is Your Traffic?&#160;by&#160;Online Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; How Good Is Your Traffic?&#160;by&#160;Online Opportunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here for a great article on the differences between Digg and Stumble traffic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here for a great article on the differences between Digg and Stumble traffic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>You submit them just like any other and the community will decide if he writes like a genius ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You submit them just like any other and the community will decide if he writes like a genius <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Mogan</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Mogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>Hey! How do I ask Stumbleupon and Digg to check out my friends blog. He writes about computers brilliantly! He writes like a genius actually. He makes computer talk easy to understand. He brings it home! I say thanks to Allen Canning on Facebook. Take a look at his blogs! Amazing guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! How do I ask Stumbleupon and Digg to check out my friends blog. He writes about computers brilliantly! He writes like a genius actually. He makes computer talk easy to understand. He brings it home! I say thanks to Allen Canning on Facebook. Take a look at his blogs! Amazing guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stumbleupon or Digg? &#124; Chris Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Stumbleupon or Digg? &#124; Chris Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>[...] I have never felt that digg is a good way of building either &#8217;sticky&#8217; traffic, or regular commenters, and as both of those are way more important than &#8216;5 minutes of fame&#8217; on the digg front page I have never worried about not been dugg, nor have I actively sort it. Sure I have a digg option on the blog but that is more by default than design. Digg is not actually that great for traffic building, unless you reach the front page, digg traffic is limited. Even reaching the up and coming popular page no longer provides a steady stream however hit the front page and traffic will increase rapidly, with a sharp decline over a period of a week. Digg long term traffic is very week with even popular stories only receiving a handful of new visitors. Comments on the Digg page do increase traffic but only at the up and coming stage. Venture Skills [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have never felt that digg is a good way of building either &#8217;sticky&#8217; traffic, or regular commenters, and as both of those are way more important than &#8216;5 minutes of fame&#8217; on the digg front page I have never worried about not been dugg, nor have I actively sort it. Sure I have a digg option on the blog but that is more by default than design. Digg is not actually that great for traffic building, unless you reach the front page, digg traffic is limited. Even reaching the up and coming popular page no longer provides a steady stream however hit the front page and traffic will increase rapidly, with a sharp decline over a period of a week. Digg long term traffic is very week with even popular stories only receiving a handful of new visitors. Comments on the Digg page do increase traffic but only at the up and coming stage. Venture Skills [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHESSNOID</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>CHESSNOID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>This is a great post with nice comparisons of the different social medias. I prefer stumbleupon too. Cheers! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post with nice comparisons of the different social medias. I prefer stumbleupon too. Cheers! <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mipovia</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2007/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>mipovia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ventureskills.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/stumbleupon-vs-digg-voyeurs-vs-sheep/#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Nice, I am working on an article about services like digg, delicious and other bookmarking tools. But I don&#039;t use any of the too famous ones as they have a boring interface &quot;TEXT TEXT LOREM IPSUM TEXT&quot;. My favorite bookmarkers are diigo &amp; clipmarks. Hail the Sheep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, I am working on an article about services like digg, delicious and other bookmarking tools. But I don&#8217;t use any of the too famous ones as they have a boring interface &#8220;TEXT TEXT LOREM IPSUM TEXT&#8221;. My favorite bookmarkers are diigo &amp; clipmarks. Hail the Sheep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
