<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr Cutts are you sure about that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/</link>
	<description>The Non SEO Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Agrahari</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Agrahari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>I have never gone thru such any case. First time i am reading such comment and that too from Matt. Matt Please give one such example where you can show changing the ownership affects link value to zero.

I will raise this comment in SEO forums.

&lt;em&gt;Edit by Tim I removed the comment spamming link, but kept the comment because I thought it was funny&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never gone thru such any case. First time i am reading such comment and that too from Matt. Matt Please give one such example where you can show changing the ownership affects link value to zero.</p>
<p>I will raise this comment in SEO forums.</p>
<p><em>Edit by Tim I removed the comment spamming link, but kept the comment because I thought it was funny</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My name is not SEO and I will learn to read</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>My name is not SEO and I will learn to read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve noticed that activity before. I bought an expired domain (who hasn&#039;t) and noticed a big drop in it&#039;s PR and the links Google associated with it soon after I got hold of it. So I suspected they must have know the domain was bought and changed ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve noticed that activity before. I bought an expired domain (who hasn&#8217;t) and noticed a big drop in it&#8217;s PR and the links Google associated with it soon after I got hold of it. So I suspected they must have know the domain was bought and changed ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>I personally agree Igore. I have seen websites, that had been sold, they ownerships been changed, even the hostings, and there has been no change in the results. Matt is High I guess :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally agree Igore. I have seen websites, that had been sold, they ownerships been changed, even the hostings, and there has been no change in the results. Matt is High I guess <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simple Block segmentation analysis &#8226; Tim Nash UK SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Simple Block segmentation analysis &#8226; Tim Nash UK SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-973</guid>
		<description>[...] Block segmentation analysisgrumpy linksImproving Clickthrough rates on SERPsMr Cutts are you sure about that?Wordpress suitable for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Block segmentation analysisgrumpy linksImproving Clickthrough rates on SERPsMr Cutts are you sure about that?Wordpress suitable for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor The Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor The Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Tim, you better go see Matt and clarify this. From what I gather there is no consensus to support this claim.

What Matt means is that if you buy a travel related domain and use it for SEO blog or viagra, etc. incoming links will be devalued.

But you never know, need to verify with him! He does talk in riddles! I guess he tries to see how much he can scare Black Hats off and always pushes the envelope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, you better go see Matt and clarify this. From what I gather there is no consensus to support this claim.</p>
<p>What Matt means is that if you buy a travel related domain and use it for SEO blog or viagra, etc. incoming links will be devalued.</p>
<p>But you never know, need to verify with him! He does talk in riddles! I guess he tries to see how much he can scare Black Hats off and always pushes the envelope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Thanks Greg but I don&#039;t think that is the one Brian means as it does not mention him using phased whois as part of a contract which is what I was after :) Unless he meant


&lt;blockquote&gt;Good question….I try to change as little of the whois as possible….getting their register login is the ultimate….beyond that, I try to change as little as possible…that’s all I’ll say.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not quite the same thing at all but I can understand why he said it when he did, though it is related very much with the sandbox which is not something that really exists these days.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Greg but I don&#8217;t think that is the one Brian means as it does not mention him using phased whois as part of a contract which is what I was after <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Unless he meant</p>
<blockquote><p>Good question….I try to change as little of the whois as possible….getting their register login is the ultimate….beyond that, I try to change as little as possible…that’s all I’ll say.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not quite the same thing at all but I can understand why he said it when he did, though it is related very much with the sandbox which is not something that really exists these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-904</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a link to Jim Boykin&#039;s article talking about buying sites
jimboykin.com/screw-the-sandbox-buy-and-old-site/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s a link to Jim Boykin&#8217;s article talking about buying sites<br />
jimboykin.com/screw-the-sandbox-buy-and-old-site/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shah</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-901</guid>
		<description>If this is true, then why do banned domains continue to be banned by Google long after they&#039;ve expired and re-registered by other people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is true, then why do banned domains continue to be banned by Google long after they&#8217;ve expired and re-registered by other people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-899</guid>
		<description>This sounds like more Warmongering and inducing fear on Webmasters.

Matt Cutts give it a break!

The guy who buys your house after you cannot pay your bank note can resale it for a value greater than zero, something around the market going rate!

A property does not become valueless just because it changes ownership!

Google needs to stop playing God!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like more Warmongering and inducing fear on Webmasters.</p>
<p>Matt Cutts give it a break!</p>
<p>The guy who buys your house after you cannot pay your bank note can resale it for a value greater than zero, something around the market going rate!</p>
<p>A property does not become valueless just because it changes ownership!</p>
<p>Google needs to stop playing God!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Prough</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/04/2008/google-using-whois-in-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Prough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=133#comment-897</guid>
		<description>The links should stay as in all honesty the belong to the site/domain.  If I am to sell a online store, clearly I am going to make it rank and do some pretty significant link building to make it a better offering for purchase. So if the buyer is running related content, or in this case the developed content, why on earth would the site stand to lose its backlinks or rank.

So, Google me this... Yahoo sells to MSN they should lose all authority, rank and inbound links... Right? To hell with any merit a domain may have, I think not.

The links, rank, trust, and authority are exactly why domains do not depreciate in value... Unless you screw one up.

When you 301, backlinks are transferred regardless of the name.  It then boils down their worth... Are the considered relative enough or will they be devalued. They will however remain attached to the domain, and transfer over (After a while).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links should stay as in all honesty the belong to the site/domain.  If I am to sell a online store, clearly I am going to make it rank and do some pretty significant link building to make it a better offering for purchase. So if the buyer is running related content, or in this case the developed content, why on earth would the site stand to lose its backlinks or rank.</p>
<p>So, Google me this&#8230; Yahoo sells to MSN they should lose all authority, rank and inbound links&#8230; Right? To hell with any merit a domain may have, I think not.</p>
<p>The links, rank, trust, and authority are exactly why domains do not depreciate in value&#8230; Unless you screw one up.</p>
<p>When you 301, backlinks are transferred regardless of the name.  It then boils down their worth&#8230; Are the considered relative enough or will they be devalued. They will however remain attached to the domain, and transfer over (After a while).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
