Comments on: Making SENSE of your offline campaigns

By: Tim Nash

Tim Nash — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:38:25 +0000

It’s one of the reasons I use tnash.eu for my shortening, people know my user handle is tnash on most sites so it works nicely of course I would have preferred nash.eu but someone else nabbed it, the cheek!

Just to note your comment was consumed by Aksimet just for your info.

By: Ed Baxter

Ed Baxter — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:48:19 +0000

Sounds like an interesting experiment. Like Carolynlyn i’ve been a victim of rickrolls and the like far too often so I don’t always trust short domain names. I’ve found that having a short but recognisable domain, if possible, is the best option!

By: Carolynlyn

Carolynlyn — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:30 +0000

Will be very interested to hear how the experiment goes. I’ve only over used different telephone numbers to track offline campaigns as at the time a new telephone number was easier for us to set up than a new URL. On the web I prefer to see the full url before clicking it as am suspicious of tiny urls – a victim of too many rick rolls. Offline i’m not sure what I’d prefer to type out of the two options, though I’m generally one of those people who googles the company rather than typing in the url.