<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/</link>
	<description>The Non SEO Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Nash UK SEO Blog turned 2 &#8226; Tim Nash &#8220;stuff&#8221; Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Nash UK SEO Blog turned 2 &#8226; Tim Nash &#8220;stuff&#8221; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>[...] Flash SEO revisited [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flash SEO revisited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO and Website Design – 7 things to get closer to the ultimate partnership &#124; styl.eti.me</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO and Website Design – 7 things to get closer to the ultimate partnership &#124; styl.eti.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>[...] I started toying around with Flash 2003/4 when I was at Uni, not realising it’s not something you can really toy around with.  Its sophistication provides limitless design opportunities – great for creative designers &#8211; but it does come at a cost.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I started toying around with Flash 2003/4 when I was at Uni, not realising it’s not something you can really toy around with.  Its sophistication provides limitless design opportunities – great for creative designers &#8211; but it does come at a cost.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wins a Browser War? &#8226; Tim Nash UK SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wins a Browser War? &#8226; Tim Nash UK SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>[...] only one rendering agent to do such analysis (it&#039;s worth remembering that Google “new found” Flash search ability is based on similar modified browser technology) and not have to deal with 3 or 4. If I can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only one rendering agent to do such analysis (it&#8217;s worth remembering that Google “new found” Flash search ability is based on similar modified browser technology) and not have to deal with 3 or 4. If I can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>Flash does pass link juice and pagerank as I have recently observed evidence to confirm this when working on a client site. 

Basically we created a site, uploaded it to a private preview area on our site (no IBL&#039;s of course, no pagerank). There was a link within one of these Flash files hard coded to our site and which remained unchanged when we supplied the client with the final files. Client puts all files on their website (Pagerank 6) and a while later I notice some of our initial development links had been indexed by Google... Of course this mistake was rectified but in the meantime, our preview links had enjoyed pageranks between 3 and 5!

What I do wonder is can Google find all links within a Flash file, even those off-stage... I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a black-hat technique in there just waiting to be exploited by unscrupulous SEO&#039;s!!

Thanks

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash does pass link juice and pagerank as I have recently observed evidence to confirm this when working on a client site. </p>
<p>Basically we created a site, uploaded it to a private preview area on our site (no IBL&#8217;s of course, no pagerank). There was a link within one of these Flash files hard coded to our site and which remained unchanged when we supplied the client with the final files. Client puts all files on their website (Pagerank 6) and a while later I notice some of our initial development links had been indexed by Google&#8230; Of course this mistake was rectified but in the meantime, our preview links had enjoyed pageranks between 3 and 5!</p>
<p>What I do wonder is can Google find all links within a Flash file, even those off-stage&#8230; I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a black-hat technique in there just waiting to be exploited by unscrupulous SEO&#8217;s!!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO - All 2009 Nominees &#187; SEMMYS.org</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO - All 2009 Nominees &#187; SEMMYS.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>[...] Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 Tim Nash &#124; 7/15/08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 Tim Nash | 7/15/08 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff McNeil</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff McNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>I am still unclear of the impact a Flash navigation menu (combined with pure HTML rest-of-site) will impact SEO. If your nav menu in Flash contains symbols with getURL links the links are not followed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still unclear of the impact a Flash navigation menu (combined with pure HTML rest-of-site) will impact SEO. If your nav menu in Flash contains symbols with getURL links the links are not followed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Engaging Collection Of Links - This Month In SEO - 7/08 &#124; TheVanBlog &#124; Van SEO Design</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>An Engaging Collection Of Links - This Month In SEO - 7/08 &#124; TheVanBlog &#124; Van SEO Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>[...] Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: July &#8216;08: Best Search/Marketing Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>July &#8216;08: Best Search/Marketing Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Nash: Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Nash: Flash SEO Indexing Revisited Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the test.  I&#039;ve been wondering about the flash indexing ability of google.  It looks as though its improving just not there quite yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the test.  I&#8217;ve been wondering about the flash indexing ability of google.  It looks as though its improving just not there quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Armstrong Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/07/2008/flash-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Armstrong Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=179#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>So when will we be able to use the compelling design and motion provided by Flash and still have a site that is seo friendly.  I currently run two sites one for seo one for pure athsetics.  I would love to meld the two together and focus my attention on one.     Thansk for a great blog - great information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when will we be able to use the compelling design and motion provided by Flash and still have a site that is seo friendly.  I currently run two sites one for seo one for pure athsetics.  I would love to meld the two together and focus my attention on one.     Thansk for a great blog &#8211; great information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
