<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google spreads malware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/</link>
	<description>The Stuff Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.newartoriginals.com &#171; Newartoriginals&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/comment-page-1/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>www.newartoriginals.com &#171; Newartoriginals&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=237#comment-3754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/" rel="nofollow">http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=237#comment-2223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you should have read the whole article ;) or even just the next paragraph would have done you then your comment wouldn&#039;t be subject to a sarcky response but alas not. 

The wording of the google warning has I believe been subject to debate the phrase &quot;contains elements&quot; is according to several arm chair lawyers misleading and while the sentence is as you say concise that doesn&#039;t change the fact google blocked there own site and sent me as a user a warning &quot;visiting this [google.co.uk] may harm your pc&quot; it&#039;s the big heading by the way if your wondering and no I put the bracketed google.co.uk in to remind you which site it had blocked ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should have read the whole article <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  or even just the next paragraph would have done you then your comment wouldn&#8217;t be subject to a sarcky response but alas not. </p>
<p>The wording of the google warning has I believe been subject to debate the phrase &#8220;contains elements&#8221; is according to several arm chair lawyers misleading and while the sentence is as you say concise that doesn&#8217;t change the fact google blocked there own site and sent me as a user a warning &#8220;visiting this [google.co.uk] may harm your pc&#8221; it&#8217;s the big heading by the way if your wondering and no I put the bracketed google.co.uk in to remind you which site it had blocked <img src='http://www.timnash.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikola</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/12/2008/google-spreads-malware/comment-page-1/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timnash.co.uk/?p=237#comment-2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is funny, not because of what you pointed to, but for your defense of a &quot;false positive&quot;. Google didn&#039;t say that google.co.uk would harm your computer. Sentence is very concise. And no, I don&#039;t love google]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny, not because of what you pointed to, but for your defense of a &#8220;false positive&#8221;. Google didn&#8217;t say that google.co.uk would harm your computer. Sentence is very concise. And no, I don&#8217;t love google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
