<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About Tim Nash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timnash.co.uk/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk</link>
	<description>The Stuff Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDF's are Search Engine Capable? &#124; SEO by Chris Estes</title>
		<link>http://www.timnash.co.uk/about/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>PDF's are Search Engine Capable? &#124; SEO by Chris Estes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tim Nash an SEO in the UK caught my eye with a test of searchabilty of PDF&#8217;s. Though his conclusion on the worth of making PDF&#8217;s search engine friendly are not decisive, I feel that the ease of making the document search friendly is worth it.&#160; Take a look at the post and if you have questions on making PDF documents search engine friendly contact Search Engine Optimization by Chris or comment below. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Nash an SEO in the UK caught my eye with a test of searchabilty of PDF&#8217;s. Though his conclusion on the worth of making PDF&#8217;s search engine friendly are not decisive, I feel that the ease of making the document search friendly is worth it.&nbsp; Take a look at the post and if you have questions on making PDF documents search engine friendly contact Search Engine Optimization by Chris or comment below. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
